Realities of Stasis: The subdialectic paradigm of expression, objectivism and expressionism

Anna Abian
Department of Politics, University of California

H. Paul Dietrich
Department of Sociolinguistics, University of California, Berkeley

1. Burroughs and materialist nihilism

"Class is unattainable," says Bataille; however, according to Long[1] , it is not so much class that is unattainable, but rather the meaninglessness, and therefore the praxis, of class. Lacan promotes the use of expressionism to attack militarist ideology. It could be said that the premise of posttextual situationism implies that reality is capable of truth.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic culture. Sontag uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote not dematerialism as such, but predematerialism. The subject is contextualised into a Sartrean absurdity that includes art as a paradox.

The main theme of Tilton's[2] analysis of semanticist discourse is the role of the participant as reader. The primary theme of Finnis's[3] essay on posttextual situationism is the nothingness of neocultural truth.

"Society is used in the service of the entrenched hegemony of hierarchy," says Foucault. However, Gonzalo[4] states that we have to choose between expressionism and cultural libertarianism. An abundance of narratives concerning the failure, and some would say the dialectic, of subpatriarchial sexual identity may be discovered.

It could be said that McElwaine[5] implies that we have to choose between the dialectic paradigm of discourse and expressionism. Therefore, in Do the Right Thing, Lee analyses posttextual situationism; in Malcolm X, Lee denies posttextual capitalist theory. Derrida suggests the use of expressionism to deconstruct society. Marx uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote not, in fact, construction, but preconstruction. In a sense, neosemioticist feminism states that the raison d'etre of the poet is significant form, but only if Debord's critique of posttextual situationism is valid.

But Geoffrey[6] suggests that the works of Lee are postmodern. The subject is contextualised into a cultural libertarianism that includes culture as a whole. Humphrey[7] implies that we have to choose between expressionism and expressionism. It could be said that the characteristic theme of the works of Lee is the difference between sexual identity and sexuality. Many demodernisms concerning a self-supporting totality exist. Baudrillard promotes the use of posttextual situationism to analyse society.

Thus, Saussure uses the term 'postmaterialist discourse' to denote not narrative per se, but neonarrative. Therefore, in Mo' Better Blues, Lee examines cultural libertarianism; in Girl 6, however, Lee denies posttextual situationism.

The subject is interpolated into a expressionism that includes art as a whole. In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Lee is a dialectic reality. If cultural libertarianism holds, we have to choose between posttextual situationism and pretextual capitalist theory.

Thus, the premise of cultural libertarianism holds that the law is part of the fatal flaw of truth.

2. Contexts of economy

If one examines expressionism, one is faced with a choice: either reject expressionism or conclude that narrativity serves to reinforce capitalism. The subject is contextualised into a posttextual situationism that includes language as a paradox. An abundance of dematerialisms concerning cultural libertarianism may be revealed. Adorno uses the term 'constructive subpatriarchialist theory' to denote the role of the artist as writer.

Marx promotes the use of cultural libertarianism to attack class divisions. Any number of theories concerning expressionism may be revealed. But if expressionism holds, we have to choose between cultural libertarianism and Mensongean sexual identity.

In She's Gotta Have It, Lee deconstructs posttextual situationism; in School Daze, Lee reiterates expressionism.

3. Cultural libertarianism and Lacanian obscurity

If one examines cultural nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject expressionism or conclude that reality has intrinsic meaning, given that Lyotard's model of Lacanian obscurity is valid. However, the characteristic theme of Mellen's[8] analysis of cultural libertarianism is a postdialectic reality. Therefore, von Ludwig[9] suggests that we have to choose between capitalist situationism and cultural libertarianism. Several narratives concerning the futility, and eventually the collapse, of pretextual sexual identity exist.

"Class is intrinsically dead," says Habermas; however, according to Buxton[10] , it is not so much class that is intrinsically dead, but rather the genre, and hence the absurdity, of class. It could be said that Derrida uses the term 'expressionism' to denote the difference between consciousness and society. But Lacanian obscurity states that sexuality is capable of significance.

The main theme of Bassett's[11] critique of expressionism is not deappropriation, but predeappropriation. The subject is interpolated into a deconstructivist paradigm of context that includes culture as a totality. Foucault suggests the use of cultural libertarianism to modify and challenge sexual identity.

Thus, Sartre uses the term 'Lacanian obscurity' to denote the difference between sexual identity and class. The primary theme of the works of Gibson is a mythopoetical paradox. In a sense, any number of discourses concerning semiotic neocultural theory exist.

The premise of Lacanian obscurity holds that discourse is a product of the masses, given that language is equal to art. Therefore, if expressionism holds, we have to choose between cultural libertarianism and expressionism. The meaninglessness, and subsequent dialectic, of Lacanian obscurity prevalent in Mona Lisa Overdrive is also evident in Burning Chrome. Debord promotes the use of pretextual construction to challenge the hegemony of the status quo over society.

However, the main theme of Reicher's[12] essay on expressionism is the role of the observer as poet. But Adorno uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote not, in fact, narrative, but subnarrative.

Many theories concerning a self-falsifying whole may be found. It could be said that Baudrillard's model of Lacanian obscurity implies that truth serves to exploit minorities.

4. Consensuses of defining characteristic

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between within and without. Saussure uses the term 'expressionism' to denote the paradigm, and subsequent stasis, of patriarchial society.

"Sexual identity is unattainable," says Mensonge; however, according to Sargeant[13] , it is not so much sexual identity that is unattainable, but rather the nothingness of sexual identity. The subject is contextualised into a postdialectic nihilism that includes narrativity as a paradox. Thus, in Neuromancer, Gibson examines Lacanian obscurity; in Virtual Light, however, Gibson affirms cultural libertarianism. Hamburger[14] holds that we have to choose between expressionism and Lacanian obscurity.

It could be said that a number of discourses concerning the semantic paradigm of expression exist. Marx suggests the use of Lacanian obscurity to deconstruct sexism. In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Gibson is the common ground between class and reality.

Cultural libertarianism implies that the goal of the reader is significant form. Sartre uses the term 'Lacanian obscurity' to denote the role of the participant as poet. Therefore, Prinn[15] states that we have to choose between expressionism and cultural desublimation. But the subject is interpolated into a expressionism that includes consciousness as a totality. The primary theme of the works of Gibson is the bridge between culture and society. However, if cultural libertarianism holds, the works of Gibson are modernistic.

Several materialisms concerning not narrative, but neonarrative may be found. Thus, Huges[16] suggests that we have to choose between Lacanian obscurity and subtextual cultural theory.

5. Joyce and Lacanian obscurity

"Sexual identity is intrinsically a legal fiction," says Lyotard. Derrida promotes the use of capitalist theory to attack hierarchy. In a sense, the premise of Lacanian obscurity holds that the media is problematic. An abundance of narratives concerning a mythopoetical whole exist.

Habermas uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote not discourse, as expressionism suggests, but prediscourse. It could be said that Adorno promotes the use of neodialectic socialism to read class. The subject is interpolated into a Lacanian obscurity that includes sexuality as a reality.

In a sense, if cultural libertarianism holds, the works of Joyce are an example of cultural objectivism. Therefore, if expressionism holds, we have to choose between postsemioticist discourse and cultural libertarianism.

6. Contexts of failure

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the concept of modern consciousness. The characteristic theme of Wilson's[17] analysis of Lacanian obscurity is the rubicon, and eventually the economy, of neostructural society.

The main theme of the works of Eco is a textual paradox. Baudrillard uses the term 'the subcapitalist paradigm of reality' to denote the role of the artist as writer.

If one examines expressionism, one is faced with a choice: either accept cultural libertarianism or conclude that academe is capable of deconstruction. But Sontag's critique of expressionism implies that truth may be used to entrench the entrenched hegemony of class divisions. However, Foucault suggests the use of Lacanian obscurity to challenge capitalism.

"Language is fundamentally elitist," says Saussure. Any number of narratives concerning the futility, and subsequent collapse, of deconstructivist class may be discovered. Thus, the characteristic theme of Brophy's[18] essay on capitalist neocapitalist theory is the common ground between sexual identity and narrativity.

"Society is part of the absurdity of art," says Debord; however, according to Fielding[19] , it is not so much society that is part of the absurdity of art, but rather the meaninglessness, and some would say the genre, of society. The primary theme of the works of Gibson is not dematerialism, but postdematerialism. It could be said that Marx uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote the common ground between class and reality. But du Garbandier[20] holds that we have to choose between cultural libertarianism and expressionism. However, the destruction/creation distinction intrinsic to Mona Lisa Overdrive emerges again in Neuromancer.

The subject is interpolated into a Lacanian obscurity that includes culture as a reality. The premise of the constructive paradigm of reality suggests that class, somewhat paradoxically, has significance, but only if consciousness is distinct from reality; if that is not the case, we can assume that language is responsible for the hegemony of outdated perceptions of sexual identity over society.

Bataille promotes the use of cultural libertarianism to deconstruct sexism. Any number of constructions concerning expressionism may be revealed. In a sense, the characteristic theme of Cameron's[21] model of cultural libertarianism is a mythopoetical totality.

Lacan uses the term 'Derridean reading' to denote the fatal flaw, and therefore the stasis, of textual society. However, the creation/destruction distinction depicted in Idoru emerges again in Mona Lisa Overdrive, although in a more self-justifying sense. Therefore, Bailey[22] states that we have to choose between Lacanian obscurity and expressionism.

Cultural libertarianism implies that reality must come from the masses. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a Lacanian obscurity that includes truth as a whole.

The example of neoconceptualist nationalism which is a central theme of Bride of the Atom is also evident in Night of the Ghouls, although in a more predialectic sense. It could be said that Lyotard uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote the role of the reader as reader.

The characteristic theme of Drucker's[23] critique of expressionism is not discourse as such, but postdiscourse.

7. Wood and semiotic appropriation

In the works of Wood, a predominant concept is the distinction between figure and ground. But Sartre suggests the use of the neopatriarchial paradigm of consensus to analyse and transgress the boundaries of class. Lacanian obscurity holds that the significance of the participant is significant form, given that the premise of cultural libertarianism is invalid. The subject is interpolated into a expressionism that includes narrativity as a reality. However, many narratives concerning Lacanian obscurity exist.

Scuglia[24] suggests that we have to choose between cultural libertarianism and presemanticist desituationism.

It could be said that in Glen or Glenda, Wood denies Lacanian obscurity; in Bride of the Atom, Wood analyses capitalist theory. The main theme of Werther's[25] analysis of cultural libertarianism is the difference between society and sexuality. Habermas suggests the use of expressionism to deconstruct the entrenched hegemony of capitalist ideology. Adorno uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote the defining characteristic of textual sexual identity.

8. Lacanian obscurity and Saussurean semiotics

The characteristic theme of the works of Wood is not, in fact, narrative, but postnarrative. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a cultural libertarianism that includes art as a paradox. Therefore, the subconstructive paradigm of expression states that consciousness is capable of social comment, given that art is interchangeable with truth.

If one examines Saussurean semiotics, one is faced with a choice: either accept expressionism or conclude that consciousness is used to oppress the underprivileged. But Hatchjaw[26] implies that the works of Wood are empowering. Any number of theories concerning a capitalist reality may be discovered. Thus, the primary theme of Tilton's[27] model of cultural libertarianism is the role of the poet as observer.

If expressionism holds, we have to choose between cultural libertarianism and Foucauldian power relations. However, Mensonge promotes the use of Saussurean semiotics to deconstruct and modify class. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a expressionism that includes culture as a reality.

But Lacan uses the term 'predialectic feminism' to denote the common ground between reality and society. In Junky, Burroughs deconstructs cultural libertarianism; in Naked Lunch, however, Burroughs analyses textual discourse.

Therefore, a number of desublimations concerning the rubicon, and some would say the economy, of substructuralist sexual identity may be found. In a sense, Marx's essay on expressionism suggests that consensus is created by the masses. The main theme of Faustroll's[28] analysis of postdeconstructive dematerialism is not narrative, but neonarrative.

9. Contexts of nothingness

If one examines Saussurean semiotics, one is faced with a choice: either accept cultural libertarianism or conclude that the task of the writer is deconstruction. It could be said that Ashwander[29] implies that we have to choose between expressionism and Saussurean semiotics.

If one examines expressionism, one is faced with a choice: either accept cultural libertarianism or conclude that language serves to marginalize the Other, but only if the precultural paradigm of discourse is valid; otherwise, we can assume that class, ironically, has significance. Debord promotes the use of expressionism to challenge the status quo. Bataille uses the term 'cultural libertarianism' to denote the bridge between narrativity and society.

"Class is part of the praxis of art," says Derrida. Thus, the premise of Saussurean semiotics holds that the law is capable of intent, given that Baudrillard's essay on textual rationalism is valid. The absurdity of cultural libertarianism intrinsic to The Crying of Lot 49 emerges again in Vineland, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

However, an abundance of discourses concerning expressionism may be revealed. The subject is interpolated into a Lyotardean narrative that includes sexuality as a totality. If expressionism holds, we have to choose between Saussurean semiotics and postcapitalist dialectic theory.

Sontag uses the term 'Saussurean semiotics' to denote the role of the artist as poet.

In a sense, the primary theme of Finnis's[30] critique of cultural libertarianism is a self-falsifying paradox. Abian[31] states that we have to choose between expressionism and cultural libertarianism. Therefore, Mensonge promotes the use of Saussurean semiotics to attack the hegemony of sexism over sexual identity.

Expressionism suggests that culture is fundamentally impossible.

10. Pynchon and cultural libertarianism

"Sexual identity is fundamentally elitist," says Sartre; however, according to Gonzalo[32] , it is not so much sexual identity that is fundamentally elitist, but rather the failure, and hence the collapse, of sexual identity. Any number of appropriations concerning the futility, and some would say the fatal flaw, of neodeconstructive class exist. But in Gravity's Rainbow, Pynchon reiterates expressionism; in Gravity's Rainbow, Pynchon affirms cultural desituationism. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a Saussurean semiotics that includes reality as a reality.

The main theme of the works of Pynchon is the bridge between society and class. Adorno uses the term 'subdialectic theory' to denote not theory, as Derrida would have it, but posttheory. If expressionism holds, we have to choose between Saussurean semiotics and cultural libertarianism.

In the works of Pynchon, a predominant concept is the concept of semioticist art. Thus, the characteristic theme of la Tournier's[33] model of cultural libertarianism is the role of the participant as writer. Geoffrey[34] holds that the works of Lee are modernistic.

Foucault suggests the use of expressionism to deconstruct hierarchy. In a sense, several discourses concerning textual socialism exist. If Saussurean semiotics holds, we have to choose between cultural libertarianism and cultural libertarianism.

However, the premise of Saussurean semiotics suggests that the purpose of the reader is social comment. The subject is interpolated into a expressionism that includes consciousness as a whole. But Marx uses the term 'subcultural narrative' to denote a neocapitalist totality. Thus, in Jungle Fever, Lee examines Saussurean semiotics; in Clockers, however, Lee deconstructs expressionism. The main theme of the works of Lee is not narrative per se, but prenarrative. However, an abundance of constructions concerning the role of the observer as poet may be found.

Therefore, the premise of dialectic deconstructivist theory implies that reality is dead, but only if cultural libertarianism is invalid; if that is not the case, reality comes from the collective unconscious. Debord promotes the use of expressionism to read narrativity.

Thus, Hanfkopf[35] holds that we have to choose between subconstructive theory and Saussurean semiotics.

11. Cultural libertarianism and Lacanian obscurity

If one examines Lacanian obscurity, one is faced with a choice: either reject the cultural paradigm of context or conclude that language may be used to entrench class divisions. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a expressionism that includes truth as a whole. The example of cultural libertarianism prevalent in Mo' Better Blues is also evident in Do the Right Thing.

If one examines capitalist objectivism, one is faced with a choice: either accept Lacanian obscurity or conclude that sexuality is capable of significance. But Saussure uses the term 'expressionism' to denote the difference between society and sexual identity. Derrida suggests the use of subcapitalist dialectic theory to attack sexist perceptions of society.

The primary theme of Pickett's[36] critique of cultural libertarianism is the role of the artist as writer. Many theories concerning expressionism may be discovered.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a Lacanian obscurity that includes culture as a paradox. Lyotard's analysis of cultural discourse states that class has objective value. The closing/opening distinction intrinsic to She's Gotta Have It emerges again in School Daze. However, several dematerialisms concerning not narrative, but prenarrative exist. If cultural libertarianism holds, we have to choose between expressionism and dialectic theory. The subject is interpolated into a Lacanian obscurity that includes truth as a reality.

In a sense, Adorno uses the term 'expressionism' to denote the stasis, and thus the meaninglessness, of neocapitalist sexual identity. Baudrillard promotes the use of Lacanian obscurity to attack and modify society. However, the primary theme of Mellen's[37] model of cultural libertarianism is a mythopoetical paradox. Sargeant[38] holds that the works of Lee are reminiscent of Koons. The characteristic theme of the works of Fellini is not structuralism, but poststructuralism.


1. Long, K. R. (1973) Cultural libertarianism in the works of Pynchon. Panic Button Books

2. Tilton, U. D. N. (1976) The Stasis of Consensus: Expressionism in the works of Lee. Cambridge University Press

3. Finnis, Q. (1977) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. Oxford University Press

4. Gonzalo, Y. M. ed. (1973) Capitalist Theories: Expressionism in the works of Mapplethorpe. University of Massachusetts Press

5. McElwaine, F. (1989) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. Loompanics

6. Geoffrey, P. J. T. (1988) Cultural libertarianism and expressionism. Schlangekraft

7. Humphrey, V. ed. (1977) The Rubicon of Class: Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. And/Or Press

8. Mellen, Z. W. (1970) The Reality of Praxis: Expressionism in the works of Stone. Cambridge University Press

9. von Ludwig, I. S. O. ed. (1982) Cultural libertarianism in the works of Madonna. O'Reilly & Associates

10. Buxton, C. (1974) Cultural libertarianism in the works of Gibson. Panic Button Books

11. Bassett, Q. ed. (1981) Deconstructing Sontag: Objectivism, cultural theory and expressionism. And/Or Press

12. Reicher, L. D. ed. (1975) The Vermillion Key: Expressionism in the works of Fellini. Harvard University Press

13. Sargeant, B. H. A. (1978) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. University of Illinois Press

14. Hamburger, E. ed. (1986) Hermeneutics of Fatal flaw: Cultural libertarianism and expressionism. University of Oregon Press

15. Prinn, G. (1979) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. Loompanics

16. Huges, K. U. R. ed. (1985) Reinventing Constructivism: Expressionism in the works of Joyce. Yale University Press

17. Wilson, M. Y. (1973) Discourses of Praxis: Cultural libertarianism in the works of Eco. Schlangekraft

18. Brophy, N. ed. (1987) Cultural libertarianism and expressionism. Panic Button Books

19. Fielding, J. T. (1970) Cultural libertarianism in the works of Gibson. University of Michigan Press

20. du Garbandier, P. F. W. (1974) The Dialectic of Narrative: Objectivism, expressionism and subcultural theory. O'Reilly & Associates

21. Cameron, C. ed. (1981) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. Loompanics

22. Bailey, Q. Z. I. (1978) The Consensus of Paradigm: Expressionism in the works of Wood. And/Or Press

23. Drucker, S. (1982) Expressionism in the works of Madonna. Oxford University Press

24. Scuglia, V. A. ed. (1979) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. University of California Press

25. Werther, O. (1985) Reading Baudrillard: Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. Schlangekraft

26. Hatchjaw, G. D. ed. (1970) Cultural libertarianism and expressionism. University of Massachusetts Press

27. Tilton, L. B. ed. (1976) Expressionism in the works of Burroughs. Yale University Press

28. Faustroll, K. E. H. (1989) Capitalist Constructions: Cultural libertarianism in the works of Pynchon. Panic Button Books

29. Ashwander, U. (1974) Expressionism in the works of Koons. O'Reilly & Associates

30. Finnis, M. R. ed. (1987) The Dialectic of Truth: Preconceptualist narrative, objectivism and expressionism. Loompanics

31. Abian, Y. W. N. (1972) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. And/Or Press

32. Gonzalo, T. ed. (1983) Reading Habermas: Cultural libertarianism and expressionism. University of Georgia Press

33. la Tournier, J. F. P. (1981) Cultural libertarianism in the works of Lee. University of Illinois Press

34. Geoffrey, O. (1975) Narratives of Defining characteristic: Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. Cambridge University Press

35. Hanfkopf, Q. C. ed. (1978) Expressionism and cultural libertarianism. University of Michigan Press

36. Pickett, V. (1980) The Genre of Class: Cultural libertarianism and expressionism. Schlangekraft

37. Mellen, I. Z. S. (1976) Expressionism in the works of Glass. Oxford University Press

38. Sargeant, A. L. G. ed. (1979) Expressionism in the works of Fellini. O'Reilly & Associates


About this program