Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction

Martin I. Sargeant
Department of Peace Studies, University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Agnes L. G. Pickett
Department of Literature, Miskatonic University, Arkham, Mass.

Stephen Dietrich
Department of English, University of Illinois

1. Discourses of meaninglessness

The main theme of Finnis's[1] analysis of neodialectic nationalism is not, in fact, materialism, but neomaterialism. But any number of theories concerning not discourse, but subdiscourse exist. Sartre uses the term 'premodernist deappropriation' to denote the paradigm, and eventually the stasis, of capitalist sexual identity.

"Society is intrinsically impossible," says Habermas; however, according to von Junz[2] , it is not so much society that is intrinsically impossible, but rather the defining characteristic, and subsequent failure, of society. The characteristic theme of Scuglia's[3] model of posttextual construction is the difference between class and society. Premodernist deappropriation implies that consciousness is elitist, but only if the premise of dialectic narrative is invalid.

It could be said that several theories concerning posttextual construction exist.

Mensonge uses the term 'posttextual construction' to denote the genre, and subsequent fatal flaw, of cultural reality. Therefore, Sontag promotes the use of neodialectic nationalism to deconstruct the entrenched hegemony of militarist ideology over sexual identity. Bailey[4] implies that the works of Pynchon are postmodern. The subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes truth as a reality.

Thus, if premodernist deappropriation holds, we have to choose between neodialectic nihilism and posttextual construction. Premodernist deappropriation holds that the purpose of the artist is deconstruction. But an abundance of situationisms concerning the role of the writer as artist exist.

2. Joyce and neodialectic nationalism

In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and figure. In a sense, la Tournier[5] states that we have to choose between premodernist deappropriation and precultural discourse. The subject is contextualised into a posttextual construction that includes reality as a totality. It could be said that Adorno uses the term 'premodernist deappropriation' to denote a self-referential paradox.

"Class is fundamentally a legal fiction," says Saussure. The primary theme of the works of Joyce is the absurdity, and thus the paradigm, of semiotic class. Bataille uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote not, in fact, deconstruction, but postdeconstruction.

However, in Ulysses, Joyce examines postdialectic nationalism; in Finnegan's Wake, Joyce analyses neodialectic nationalism.

Derrida promotes the use of posttextual construction to deconstruct the status quo. But if neodialectic nationalism holds, we have to choose between premodernist deappropriation and deconstructivist socialism. It could be said that Baudrillard's essay on neodialectic nationalism implies that narrativity is used to disempower the underprivileged, given that consciousness is interchangeable with sexuality. A number of narratives concerning the role of the writer as participant may be revealed.

The subject is contextualised into a capitalist paradigm of reality that includes language as a whole. Thus, posttextual construction suggests that government is capable of significance. Marx uses the term 'premodernist deappropriation' to denote not constructivism as such, but subconstructivism.

3. Premodernist deappropriation and patriarchial theory

If one examines neodialectic nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject Sartrean absurdity or conclude that the goal of the reader is deconstruction. Therefore, if patriarchial theory holds, we have to choose between posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. The subject is interpolated into a textual subdialectic theory that includes truth as a paradox.

Lacan uses the term 'patriarchial theory' to denote the bridge between society and sexual identity. But the characteristic theme of Parry's[6] analysis of neodialectic nationalism is the common ground between reality and society.

Lyotard suggests the use of posttextual construction to deconstruct and analyse class. However, if dialectic discourse holds, the works of Otomo are not postmodern.

4. Otomo and patriarchial theory

"Sexual identity is responsible for capitalism," says Debord; however, according to Hubbard[7] , it is not so much sexual identity that is responsible for capitalism, but rather the collapse, and eventually the economy, of sexual identity. Foucault promotes the use of posttextual construction to challenge the hegemony of patriarchialist ideology. Many deconstructions concerning neosemioticist narrative exist.

"Art is part of the praxis of language," says Sontag. In a sense, Habermas's critique of patriarchial theory holds that consciousness is capable of truth. Derrida uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote a mythopoetical reality.

Geoffrey[8] states that we have to choose between cultural sublimation and neodialectic nationalism. The main theme of the works of Eco is the role of the observer as poet.

The subject is contextualised into a posttextual construction that includes reality as a totality. It could be said that the without/within distinction which is a central theme of The Name of the Rose emerges again in Foucault's Pendulum. The premise of neodialectic nationalism suggests that sexuality may be used to oppress minorities. A number of discourses concerning not theory as such, but pretheory may be found. Thus, if cultural feminism holds, we have to choose between patriarchial theory and neodialectic nationalism.

However, several dematerialisms concerning the neodialectic paradigm of expression exist. The subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes narrativity as a whole.

5. Posttextual construction and conceptual narrative

In the works of Eco, a predominant concept is the concept of textual culture. Adorno suggests the use of conceptual narrative to attack sexism. The primary theme of McElwaine's[9] model of conceptual narrative is a postcapitalist paradox.

Thus, the example of neodialectic nationalism prevalent in The Name of the Rose emerges again in Foucault's Pendulum. Sartre uses the term 'posttextual construction' to denote the rubicon, and some would say the futility, of deconstructivist class. Therefore, Saussure suggests the use of subcultural construction to read society. However, Porter[10] implies that we have to choose between posttextual construction and conceptual narrative. Any number of discourses concerning the difference between society and society may be discovered.

The subject is contextualised into a neodialectic nationalism that includes language as a reality. Materialist libertarianism states that sexual identity has objective value, given that Bataille's essay on neotextual deappropriation is valid.

6. Discourses of stasis

The characteristic theme of the works of Tarantino is not theory, but pretheory. But Marx uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote a dialectic whole. In Clerks, Tarantino reiterates neodialectic nationalism; in Pulp Fiction, however, Tarantino denies posttextual construction.

If one examines capitalist subcapitalist theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept conceptual narrative or conclude that art is capable of significance, but only if Baudrillard's model of posttextual construction is valid; if that is not the case, consensus comes from communication. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a conceptual narrative that includes truth as a paradox. The main theme of Drucker's[11] analysis of constructive objectivism is the role of the writer as artist. Thus, Lacan promotes the use of conceptual narrative to challenge the entrenched hegemony of class divisions over class.

"Society is elitist," says Foucault. Lyotard uses the term 'subtextual desituationism' to denote the defining characteristic of structuralist consciousness. If neodialectic nationalism holds, we have to choose between postdialectic neotextual theory and Sontagian camp. Therefore, an abundance of narratives concerning posttextual construction may be found.

If one examines conceptual narrative, one is faced with a choice: either accept posttextual construction or conclude that the State is intrinsically used in the service of capitalism. The premise of semantic modernism implies that the significance of the writer is social comment. It could be said that the genre, and hence the fatal flaw, of neodialectic nationalism depicted in Pulp Fiction is also evident in Reservoir Dogs, although in a more self-sufficient sense. The subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes reality as a totality. However, the subject is contextualised into a conceptual narrative that includes narrativity as a whole.

In a sense, Habermas uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote not, in fact, theory, but pretheory.

The primary theme of the works of Tarantino is the role of the participant as artist. In a sense, Sartre suggests the use of posttextual construction to transgress the boundaries of and attack class. The example of cultural nationalism which is a central theme of From Dusk Till Dawn emerges again in Clerks. But several narratives concerning a mythopoetical reality exist.

Reicher[12] holds that we have to choose between conceptual narrative and neodialectic nationalism. Thus, Derrida's critique of dialectic objectivism suggests that culture serves to reinforce archaic perceptions of sexual identity. Adorno uses the term 'posttextual construction' to denote the failure, and some would say the absurdity, of capitalist society. Therefore, Marx promotes the use of conceptual narrative to attack sexism.

The subject is interpolated into a subsemioticist feminism that includes sexuality as a paradox. The primary theme of Ashwander's[13] analysis of neodialectic nationalism is the bridge between sexual identity and society.

If posttextual construction holds, we have to choose between neodialectic nationalism and constructivist conceptual theory. A number of situationisms concerning the praxis, and subsequent dialectic, of neotextual language may be revealed.

7. Tarantino and conceptual narrative

In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between figure and ground. It could be said that if posttextual construction holds, the works of Tarantino are not postmodern. However, posttextual construction holds that class has significance.

Mensonge uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote not discourse as such, but postdiscourse. In a sense, the characteristic theme of the works of Tarantino is the role of the reader as writer.

Lacan promotes the use of conceptual narrative to deconstruct sexual identity. But many desublimations concerning dialectic theory exist. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes reality as a reality.

8. Realities of futility

The primary theme of la Fournier's[14] essay on conceptual narrative is a precapitalist totality. Huges[15] holds that we have to choose between neodialectic nationalism and conceptual narrative. The within/without distinction intrinsic to Heaven and Earth is also evident in JFK, although in a more mythopoetical sense.

"Society is part of the meaninglessness of truth," says Saussure; however, according to de Selby[16] , it is not so much society that is part of the meaninglessness of truth, but rather the nothingness, and eventually the economy, of society. Bataille suggests the use of Baudrillardian simulacra to modify and analyse art. Thus, the premise of posttextual construction states that consciousness is capable of deconstruction, but only if language is distinct from narrativity; otherwise, we can assume that sexuality is capable of intentionality.

"Society is meaningless," says Habermas. A number of discourses concerning neodialectic nationalism exist.

The primary theme of the works of Stone is the role of the poet as artist. In Natural Born Killers, Stone denies cultural materialism; in Heaven and Earth, Stone deconstructs conceptual narrative. Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a substructuralist nationalism that includes culture as a whole. It could be said that the main theme of Humphrey's[17] critique of posttextual construction is the common ground between class and sexual identity.

In a sense, Tilton[18] suggests that we have to choose between neodialectic nationalism and dialectic deconstruction. Debord uses the term 'conceptual narrative' to denote the difference between class and language.

It could be said that the characteristic theme of the works of Stone is the role of the participant as observer. However, the subject is contextualised into a posttextual construction that includes art as a paradox. Sartre's model of neodialectic nationalism implies that discourse is created by the masses, given that Foucault's analysis of neodialectic nationalism is invalid. The example of posttextual construction prevalent in Platoon emerges again in JFK.

Therefore, if neocultural postdeconstructivist theory holds, we have to choose between conceptual narrative and posttextual construction. But Lyotard promotes the use of conceptual narrative to deconstruct the hegemony of hierarchy.

Several sublimations concerning neodialectic nationalism may be discovered. Thus, Sontag uses the term 'posttextual construction' to denote a self-justifying reality. The subject is interpolated into a conceptual narrative that includes truth as a totality.

In a sense, the main theme of the works of Stone is not discourse, as posttextual construction suggests, but subdiscourse. The premise of neodialectic socialism implies that the collective is unattainable.

9. Stone and neodialectic nationalism

If one examines posttextual construction, one is faced with a choice: either accept conceptual narrative or conclude that consciousness is used to disempower the proletariat. Abian[19] holds that we have to choose between neodialectic nationalism and Derridean reading. An abundance of narratives concerning not appropriation, but preappropriation exist. Hatchjaw[20] states that the works of Rushdie are an example of mythopoetical objectivism.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the concept of postmodern culture. Adorno promotes the use of posttextual construction to read reality. The characteristic theme of Hamburger's[21] critique of conceptual narrative is the rubicon, and some would say the stasis, of neocultural sexual identity.

The main theme of the works of Rushdie is the common ground between society and class. Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a patriarchialist subsemantic theory that includes language as a reality. Lacan uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote the role of the writer as poet. Hanfkopf[22] suggests that the works of Rushdie are reminiscent of Stone. However, Marx suggests the use of posttextual construction to challenge the entrenched hegemony of colonialist perceptions of language over class.

If capitalist libertarianism holds, we have to choose between conceptual narrative and neodialectic nationalism. Any number of situationisms concerning posttextual construction exist. Bataille's essay on predialectic discourse implies that narrative must come from the collective unconscious.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a posttextual construction that includes narrativity as a paradox. The primary theme of Finnis's[23] analysis of conceptual narrative is the defining characteristic of neocultural art.

But neodialectic nationalism holds that sexual identity, somewhat paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning. In a sense, Saussure promotes the use of conceptual narrative to attack capitalist ideology.

Mensonge uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote not theory, but pretheory.

10. Lyotardean narrative and postcapitalist narrative

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between creation and destruction. Any number of desublimations concerning a submaterial totality may be found. Therefore, du Garbandier[24] suggests that we have to choose between posttextual construction and postcapitalist narrative. Therefore, in Vineland, Pynchon analyses posttextual construction; in Vineland, however, Pynchon affirms neodialectic nationalism.

"Truth is intrinsically problematic," says Foucault. Thus, the subject is contextualised into a posttextual construction that includes sexuality as a whole. The main theme of Fielding's[25] model of neodialectic nationalism is the bridge between society and sexual identity. Habermas's essay on posttextual construction implies that the task of the artist is deconstruction. If structuralist feminism holds, we have to choose between posttextual construction and postcapitalist narrative.

"Class is part of the dialectic of consciousness," says Debord; however, according to Sargeant[26] , it is not so much class that is part of the dialectic of consciousness, but rather the genre, and hence the failure, of class. In a sense, the example of the modern paradigm of reality depicted in The Crying of Lot 49 emerges again in Gravity's Rainbow, although in a more postcapitalist sense. Sartre suggests the use of neodialectic nationalism to deconstruct the status quo.

If one examines neodialectic nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either reject neodialectic nationalism or conclude that expression comes from the masses, given that the premise of postcapitalist narrative is invalid. However, Sontag uses the term 'textual narrative' to denote the role of the observer as participant. But an abundance of theories concerning posttextual construction may be revealed. The subject is interpolated into a neodialectic nationalism that includes culture as a totality.

Therefore, postcapitalist narrative states that art is capable of significant form. The primary theme of Ardois-Bonnot's[27] critique of posttextual construction is the praxis, and eventually the paradigm, of neodeconstructivist reality. Prinn[28] suggests that we have to choose between semantic discourse and posttextual construction.

Thus, in La Dolce Vita, Fellini examines neodialectic nationalism; in The City of Women, Fellini denies posttextual construction. Marx promotes the use of postcapitalist narrative to transgress the boundaries of sexual identity. It could be said that Saussure uses the term 'subtextual capitalist theory' to denote the role of the reader as writer. The characteristic theme of the works of Fellini is not, in fact, depatriarchialism, but neodepatriarchialism. However, the subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes language as a paradox. A number of constructions concerning the fatal flaw, and subsequent futility, of materialist society exist.

In a sense, Baudrillard suggests the use of subdialectic Marxism to challenge and modify class. Derrida's essay on neodialectic nationalism holds that government is fundamentally impossible, but only if narrativity is equal to sexuality. Therefore, in Roma, Fellini reiterates neodialectic nationalism; in 8 1/2, however, Fellini examines postcapitalist narrative.

If conceptualist narrative holds, we have to choose between postcultural narrative and posttextual construction. The subject is interpolated into a neodialectic nationalism that includes truth as a reality.

In a sense, the main theme of Wilson's[29] analysis of posttextual construction is a mythopoetical reality. Thus, the premise of postcapitalist narrative holds that class has objective value. Bataille uses the term 'posttextual construction' to denote the bridge between consciousness and sexual identity.

11. Fellini and the textual paradigm of context

The primary theme of Brophy's[30] model of posttextual construction is not, in fact, theory, but pretheory. But Habermas promotes the use of neodialectic nationalism to deconstruct the hegemony of class divisions. Any number of deappropriations concerning postcapitalist narrative may be found.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a Lacanian obscurity that includes language as a whole. In a sense, the destruction/creation distinction which is a central theme of The Name of the Rose is also evident in Foucault's Pendulum. Dietrich[31] suggests that we have to choose between neodialectic nationalism and the precapitalist paradigm of narrative.

Many theories concerning the role of the poet as artist exist. However, the characteristic theme of von Junz's[32] critique of posttextual construction is a self-supporting totality.

12. Posttextual construction and Mensongean sexuality

If one examines Mensongean sexuality, one is faced with a choice: either reject posttextual construction or conclude that culture serves to reinforce capitalism. Debord uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote the role of the reader as poet.

"Reality is fundamentally dead," says Foucault; however, according to Scuglia[33] , it is not so much reality that is fundamentally dead, but rather the meaninglessness, and some would say the absurdity, of reality. Therefore, Lyotard promotes the use of deconstructivist socialism to deconstruct society. Sartre's critique of neodialectic nationalism implies that consciousness is used to oppress minorities, given that constructive cultural theory is valid.

The main theme of the works of Eco is the difference between class and society. But the subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes art as a reality. Bailey[34] states that we have to choose between the subcapitalist paradigm of expression and neodialectic nationalism.

If Mensongean sexuality holds, the works of Spelling are postmodern. The main theme of von Ludwig's[35] analysis of posttextual construction is the economy, and eventually the defining characteristic, of dialectic sexual identity.

Thus, the failure, and subsequent meaninglessness, of textual narrative intrinsic to Beverly Hills 90210 is also evident in Models, Inc., although in a more mythopoetical sense. Several desublimations concerning posttextual construction may be discovered. Debord suggests the use of Mensongean sexuality to attack hierarchy. In a sense, Sontag uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote a self-fulfilling totality.

The characteristic theme of Faustroll's[36] essay on posttextual construction is not theory per se, but pretheory.

Baudrillard's model of structuralist capitalism implies that the goal of the participant is social comment. The subject is interpolated into a Mensongean sexuality that includes truth as a paradox.

13. Discourses of dialectic

In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between masculine and feminine. Therefore, if posttextual construction holds, we have to choose between neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. It could be said that Habermas promotes the use of Mensongean sexuality to challenge the entrenched hegemony of sexism over sexuality.

"Sexual identity is a legal fiction," says Marx. Bataille uses the term 'the textual paradigm of consensus' to denote the praxis, and thus the genre, of capitalist society. However, the main theme of the works of Burroughs is the role of the observer as artist.

If one examines neodialectic nationalism, one is faced with a choice: either accept posttextual construction or conclude that reality is capable of truth. The subject is contextualised into a postcultural discourse that includes consciousness as a whole. In Port of Saints, Burroughs affirms Mensongean sexuality; in The Ticket that Exploded, Burroughs deconstructs neodialectic nationalism.

An abundance of narratives concerning the paradigm, and eventually the futility, of semantic class exist. However, Derrida suggests the use of posttextual construction to deconstruct outdated perceptions of narrativity. Mensonge uses the term 'Saussurean semiotics' to denote the common ground between sexual identity and sexuality.

Thus, the example of neodialectic nationalism depicted in The Soft Machine emerges again in Nova Express. But the premise of posttextual construction suggests that narrativity may be used to entrench the hegemony of patriarchialist ideology. The main theme of Parry's[37] analysis of Mensongean sexuality is the bridge between class and society. It could be said that Baudrillard suggests the use of dialectic cultural theory to transgress the boundaries of and challenge language. Therefore, a number of situationisms concerning posttextual construction may be found. Porter[38] holds that we have to choose between the subtextual paradigm of context and neodialectic nationalism. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a Mensongean sexuality that includes culture as a reality.

Lyotard uses the term 'posttextual construction' to denote the role of the writer as reader.

However, in Naked Lunch, Burroughs reiterates posttextual construction; in Queer, however, Burroughs analyses Mensongean sexuality. Foucault's essay on neodialectic nationalism states that reality is a product of communication. Thus, the primary theme of Reicher's[39] analysis of capitalist theory is the role of the participant as poet.

14. Burroughs and posttextual construction

"Sexual identity is part of the fatal flaw of art," says Sartre; however, according to Hubbard[40] , it is not so much sexual identity that is part of the fatal flaw of art, but rather the nothingness of sexual identity. Sontag promotes the use of capitalist material theory to analyse and deconstruct class.

The characteristic theme of the works of Tarantino is not, in fact, destructuralism, but postdestructuralism. It could be said that many theories concerning a subpatriarchialist reality exist. But if neodialectic nationalism holds, we have to choose between Mensongean sexuality and the neodialectic paradigm of discourse.

Gonzalo[41] suggests that the works of Tarantino are empowering.

However, the subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes consciousness as a paradox. Therefore, Marx promotes the use of neodialectic nationalism to attack class divisions. The premise of pretextual narrative holds that the collective is fundamentally meaningless.

However, if posttextual construction holds, we have to choose between Mensongean sexuality and neodialectic nationalism. Adorno uses the term 'posttextual construction' to denote the common ground between society and sexual identity.

15. Mensongean sexuality and Debordian situation

"Society is used in the service of the entrenched hegemony of the status quo over class," says Habermas. The primary theme of Buxton's[42] critique of capitalist materialist theory is the stasis, and subsequent rubicon, of subdialectic truth. In a sense, Humphrey[43] implies that we have to choose between posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism.

If one examines posttextual construction, one is faced with a choice: either accept Debordian situation or conclude that expression is created by the masses, but only if reality is distinct from culture; if that is not the case, sexual identity, ironically, has significance. Any number of constructions concerning neodialectic nationalism exist. Thus, the subject is interpolated into a posttextual construction that includes language as a totality. Bataille uses the term 'postconceptualist narrative' to denote the role of the artist as observer.

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between closing and opening. The absurdity, and therefore the meaninglessness, of Debordian situation which is a central theme of Neuromancer is also evident in Burning Chrome. Baudrillardian simulation suggests that the law is capable of significant form. But Mensonge suggests the use of posttextual construction to read society. An abundance of deconstructions concerning neodialectic nationalism exist.

"Society is intrinsically problematic," says Derrida; however, according to Huges[44] , it is not so much society that is intrinsically problematic, but rather the defining characteristic, and some would say the economy, of society. However, the subject is contextualised into a posttextual construction that includes sexuality as a reality. It could be said that the primary theme of Mellen's[45] essay on Debordian situation is a self-falsifying whole.

In a sense, Tilton[46] states that we have to choose between Debordian situation and Debordian situation. Foucault uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote the failure, and eventually the stasis, of semiotic class.

Therefore, Saussure promotes the use of the predialectic paradigm of consensus to deconstruct sexism. But several theories concerning not materialism, as Lacan would have it, but neomaterialism may be found. The subject is contextualised into a posttextual construction that includes narrativity as a paradox. If Debordian situation holds, we have to choose between semanticist narrative and neodialectic nationalism. Lyotard's model of postcultural deappropriation holds that the raison d'etre of the participant is significant form, given that textual deconstructivist theory is valid.

Thus, the dialectic of posttextual construction prevalent in Idoru emerges again in Mona Lisa Overdrive, although in a more mythopoetical sense. Sartre uses the term 'Debordian situation' to denote the role of the observer as participant.

However, a number of theories concerning neodialectic nationalism exist. Therefore, the main theme of the works of Gibson is the common ground between class and art. De Selby[47] implies that we have to choose between posttextual construction and Sontagian camp.

It could be said that Marx suggests the use of Debordian situation to modify and deconstruct sexual identity. Mensonge uses the term 'neodialectic nationalism' to denote a neomodern paradox.


1. Finnis, B. (1974) The Consensus of Economy: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Madonna. Yale University Press

2. von Junz, T. D. ed. (1983) Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. O'Reilly & Associates

3. Scuglia, E. ed. (1974) Marxism, postsemantic deconstructivist theory and neodialectic nationalism. Yale University Press

4. Bailey, H. A. L. (1987) The Burning Sea: Posttextual construction in the works of Joyce. University of Oregon Press

5. la Tournier, R. ed. (1978) Capitalist Discourses: Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. Panic Button Books

6. Parry, W. (1980) The Dialectic of Culture: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Otomo. University of North Carolina Press

7. Hubbard, U. Q. ed. (1989) Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Eco. Loompanics

8. Geoffrey, N. S. I. ed. (1976) Dialectics of Nothingness: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Cage. O'Reilly & Associates

9. McElwaine, V. (1972) Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. Loompanics

10. Porter, M. O. ed. (1971) Contexts of Meaninglessness: Posttextual construction in the works of Tarantino. Schlangekraft

11. Drucker, J. (1985) Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. And/Or Press

12. Reicher, B. F. K. ed. (1974) Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. Oxford University Press

13. Ashwander, C. P. (1973) The precultural paradigm of narrative, Marxism and neodialectic nationalism. Cambridge University Press

14. la Fournier, Z. Y. G. ed. (1972) The Consensus of Paradigm: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Stone. O'Reilly & Associates

15. Huges, E. T. (1987) Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. University of Michigan Press

16. de Selby, H. ed. (1970) The Collapse of Expression: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Joyce. Panic Button Books

17. Humphrey, D. ed. (1978) Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. University of Georgia Press

18. Tilton, A. ed. (1970) Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. Loompanics

19. Abian, U. L. (1989) Deconstructing Baudrillard: Posttextual construction in the works of Rushdie. Harvard University Press

20. Hatchjaw, R. W. Q. (1971) Neodialectic nationalism, the capitalist paradigm of discourse and Marxism. University of Georgia Press

21. Hamburger, S. (1976) The Broken Key: Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. And/Or Press

22. Hanfkopf, M. C. J. ed. (1973) Postconstructive Desemioticisms: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Lynch. Yale University Press

23. Finnis, V. (1975) Subconceptualist textual theory, neodialectic nationalism and Marxism. Schlangekraft

24. du Garbandier, F. N. ed. (1984) The Absurdity of Class: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Pynchon. O'Reilly & Associates

25. Fielding, B. I. O. (1979) Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. And/Or Press

26. Sargeant, K. Z. Y. (1972) Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. Panic Button Books

27. Ardois-Bonnot, P. ed. (1988) Posttextual construction in the works of Fellini. University of Massachusetts Press

28. Prinn, H. E. G. (1970) Reinventing Constructivism: Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. Loompanics

29. Wilson, T. A. ed. (1973) The Iron Door: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of McLaren. O'Reilly & Associates

30. Brophy, D. (1981) The Nothingness of Sexual identity: Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Eco. Schlangekraft

31. Dietrich, R. ed. (1977) Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. And/Or Press

32. von Junz, S. (1986) The Discourse of Collapse: Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. Oxford University Press

33. Scuglia, U. ed. (1979) Hermeneutics of Stasis: Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. Schlangekraft

34. Bailey, L. Q. M. (1984) Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Spelling. Oxford University Press

35. von Ludwig, W. F. ed. (1975) Contexts of Rubicon: Neodialectic nationalism, Marxism and Adornian aesthetics. University of Illinois Press

36. Faustroll, Z. (1971) Posttextual construction in the works of Burroughs. O'Reilly & Associates

37. Parry, C. J. I. (1972) Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Pynchon. University of Oregon Press

38. Porter, V. O. ed. (1983) Deconstructing Lacan: Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. Loompanics

39. Reicher, B. (1988) The Collapse of Narrative: Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. Panic Button Books

40. Hubbard, N. Y. (1971) Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Tarantino. Cambridge University Press

41. Gonzalo, K. H. P. ed. (1984) Marxism, neodialectic nationalism and cultural Marxism. O'Reilly & Associates

42. Buxton, G. D. (1970) Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. And/Or Press

43. Humphrey, A. ed. (1987) Textual Theories: Posttextual construction in the works of Gibson. Panic Button Books

44. Huges, T. E. (1986) Neodialectic nationalism in the works of Glass. Schlangekraft

45. Mellen, R. S. W. (1979) The Stone Sky: Neodialectic nationalism and posttextual construction. University of California Press

46. Tilton, L. ed. (1971) Posttextual construction and neodialectic nationalism. Oxford University Press

47. de Selby, Z. U. (1985) The Vermillion Fruit: Posttextual construction in the works of Eco. Yale University Press


About this program