NÁHODNÝ
POSTMODERNISTICKÝ ESEJ
Na jaře t.r. jsme v Břitvě zveřejnili několik materiálů, týkajících se
napjatého vztahu postmodernismu a filosofie vědy. Šlo zejména o dva eseje doc.
Jelínka (první, druhý). Lehkost
"postmoderních" post-konstrukcí nenechává chladnými řadu lidí ani v
anglosaském světě - dobrým úvodem do problematiky je např. stránka Edwarda R.
Friedlandera, M.D., "Why I am Not a
Postmodernist", intenzivním cvičením v postmoderním "řemesle" je How to Speak
and Write Postmodern, kde Vám vysvětlí, jaké post-výrazy je třeba používat,
abyste byli "in" a na stránce How
to Deconstruct Almost Anything se naučíte, jak se s ničím, ale opravdu s ničím v
tom starém, zpuchřelém modernistickém světě (tedy v jeho paradigmatu, že) nemazlit.
Ale to ještě není všechno! Abyste se přesvědčili, že opravdu Anything Goes (nefunguje, zkusím
najít jiný link), zvolte tento link:
zde se skrývá prográmek DADA-ENGINE,
který napíše, tedy náhodně vygeneruje celý "postmodernistický" esej (a s
každým kliknutím či reloadem nový !!) ZA VÁS. Podobně jako Tristan Tzara v roce
1916 Vám garantuji, že každý esej bude věrným obrazem Vaší postmoderní post-duše
a preoriginality a že se v něm poznáte ;-)). (Děkuji Ivanovi Adamovičovi za
upozornění na tento link, pozn. P.V..) Doufám, že se také Vám podaří dosáhnout
např. této "postmoderní mety";-):
"Transgressing the
Transgressors: Toward a Transformative Hermeneutics of Total Bullshit"
Zde si můžete stáhnout ZAZIPOVANÝ SOUBOR 22 těchto
prvotřídních post-esejů (174 kb). A abyste "nekupovali zajíce v pytli",
uvádím jeden perfektní esejík jakožto ochutnávku:
(porovnejme tyto texty se SKUTEČNÝMI postmodernistickými eseji
např. v revue "Postmodern Culture" na http://www.iath.virginia.edu/pmc/ či http://www.iath.virginia.edu/pmc/current.issue/,
výsledek myslím není nezajímavý ;-) - Očekávám
velmi pravděpodobná obvinění mé osoby z hluboké neznalosti postmoderní filozofie
:-) P.V.)
Subtextual theory in the works of Madonna
O. David Bassett
Department of Sociolinguistics, University of Massachusetts
1. Madonna and cultural rationalism
"Society is fundamentally a legal fiction," says Sartre; however, according
to Hanfkopf[1] , it is not so much society that is fundamentally a
legal fiction, but rather the failure, and eventually the genre, of society. Therefore,
Baudrillard uses the term 'subtextual theory' to denote the paradigm, and therefore the
dialectic, of deconstructivist art.
If Bataillean `powerful communication' holds, the works of Madonna are modernistic.
Adorno's model of subtextual theory suggests that class, surprisingly, has objective
value.
In a sense, Drucker[2] states that we have to choose between
subtextual theory and the dialectic paradigm of discourse.
2. Consensuses of nothingness
The characteristic theme of Wilson's[3] analysis of the dialectic
paradigm of discourse is the role of the observer as reader. The primary theme of Tilton's[4] essay on cultural rationalism is a materialist paradox. The subject is
interpolated into a neocultural dematerialism that includes language as a reality. In a
sense, many desituationisms concerning the dialectic paradigm of discourse exist.
"Sexual identity is problematic," says Foucault. Thus, the subject is
contextualised into a cultural rationalism that includes sexuality as a totality.
Ardois-Bonnot[5] holds that the works of Burroughs are postmodern.
If one examines subtextual theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept
postsemantic narrative or conclude that discourse comes from communication. Marx uses the
term 'the dialectic paradigm of discourse' to denote not, in fact, construction, but
subconstruction. It could be said that any number of discourses concerning cultural
rationalism may be revealed.
Mensonge promotes the use of textual nationalism to deconstruct hierarchy.
Therefore, if subtextual theory holds, we have to choose between cultural rationalism
and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. But the premise of premodernist discourse
suggests that the task of the artist is social comment. The main theme of the works of
Burroughs is the futility, and subsequent praxis, of postcultural language.
However, Sontag uses the term 'cultural rationalism' to denote the bridge between
society and reality. A number of theories concerning the role of the writer as participant
exist. In a sense, von Ludwig[6] states that we have to choose between
the dialectic paradigm of discourse and subtextual theory.
Therefore, the subject is interpolated into a Lyotardean narrative that includes art as
a reality. Adorno suggests the use of the dialectic paradigm of discourse to modify sexual
identity. The characteristic theme of McElwaine's[7] essay on
subtextual theory is a mythopoetical reality.
3. Cultural rationalism and cultural semioticist theory
In the works of Burroughs, a predominant concept is the distinction between masculine
and feminine. In The Adding Machine, Burroughs denies the dialectic paradigm of discourse;
in Queer, however, Burroughs analyses patriarchial situationism. The characteristic theme
of Brophy's[8] critique of cultural semioticist theory is not discourse
as such, but prediscourse. Thus, subtextual theory implies that academe is capable of
significance, given that Sartre's essay on capitalist socialism is invalid.
"Class is fundamentally elitist," says Saussure. Several theories concerning
subtextual theory exist. However, Debord promotes the use of the dialectic paradigm of
discourse to read sexual identity.
Bassett[9] holds that we have to choose between substructuralist
deappropriation and cultural semioticist theory. But Derrida uses the term 'the dialectic
paradigm of discourse' to denote the rubicon of capitalist society.
The subject is interpolated into a cultural semioticist theory that includes
consciousness as a whole. An abundance of theories concerning subtextual theory exist.
However, the main theme of d'Erlette's[10] analysis of cultural
semioticist theory is the common ground between class and truth. Bataille uses the term
'postdeconstructive sublimation' to denote not, in fact, deconstruction, but
postdeconstruction. In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Burroughs is a
self-falsifying paradox.
Baudrillard promotes the use of cultural semioticist theory to deconstruct and
transgress the boundaries of society. In The Soft Machine, Burroughs reiterates subtextual
theory; in Nova Express, Burroughs examines the dialectic paradigm of discourse.
4. Contexts of defining characteristic
"Sexual identity is part of the economy of narrativity," says Lacan. It could
be said that the premise of neodialectic cultural theory suggests that culture may be used
to exploit the underprivileged, but only if language is distinct from reality; if that is
not the case, narrative is a product of the collective unconscious. If cultural
semioticist theory holds, we have to choose between subtextual theory and materialist
Marxism. Therefore, any number of theories concerning subtextual theory exist. The primary
theme of Sargeant's[11] model of the dialectic paradigm of discourse
is the role of the poet as reader. In Beverly Hills 90210, Spelling affirms subtextual
theory; in Models, Inc., however, Spelling denies subtextual theory.
If one examines cultural semioticist theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject
the pretextual paradigm of discourse or conclude that art is a legal fiction. The subject
is contextualised into a capitalist narrative that includes sexuality as a totality.
Foucault suggests the use of the dialectic paradigm of discourse to challenge outdated,
elitist perceptions of class.
The characteristic theme of Prinn's[12] critique of
neoconceptualist dialectic theory is the difference between society and sexual identity.
It could be said that Sartre uses the term 'subtextual theory' to denote the fatal flaw,
and thus the failure, of subsemantic consciousness.
Parry[13] holds that we have to choose between cultural semioticist
theory and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. Thus, Marx's essay on subtextual theory
states that society has significance, but only if truth is equal to culture; if that is
not the case, Mensonge's model of cultural discourse is one of "Sontagian camp",
and therefore intrinsically impossible. However, the main theme of the works of Madonna is
the role of the artist as observer.
Lyotard uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of discourse' to denote the role of the
participant as reader. The primary theme of the works of Madonna is the role of the writer
as poet.
In a sense, an abundance of narratives concerning the common ground between language
and sexual identity exist. The subject is interpolated into a cultural semioticist theory
that includes reality as a reality. If the dialectic paradigm of discourse holds, we have
to choose between constructivist theory and subtextual theory.
The feminine/masculine distinction prevalent in "Sex" emerges again in
"In bed with Madonna". But Baudrillard promotes the use of the pretextual
paradigm of expression to analyse class.
5. The dialectic paradigm of discourse and subcapitalist feminism
"Narrativity is part of the dialectic of reality," says Debord; however,
according to Hatchjaw[14] , it is not so much narrativity that is part
of the dialectic of reality, but rather the collapse, and some would say the nothingness,
of narrativity. Scuglia[15] holds that we have to choose between
subcapitalist feminism and the dialectic paradigm of discourse.
Therefore, the patriarchialist paradigm of narrative implies that the collective is
capable of deconstruction. The characteristic theme of Buxton's[16]
critique of subcapitalist feminism is not dematerialism, but neodematerialism.
Thus, the subject is contextualised into a subtextual theory that includes art as a
whole. Many sublimations concerning the absurdity, and subsequent economy, of capitalist
society may be found. If the dialectic paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose
between subcapitalist feminism and Saussurean semiotics. Adorno uses the term 'posttextual
theory' to denote a cultural reality. In Erotica, Madonna analyses subtextual theory; in
Material Girl, Madonna deconstructs the dialectic paradigm of discourse.
6. Consensuses of stasis
In the works of Madonna, a predominant concept is the concept of postsemiotic truth.
Thus, Bataille suggests the use of subcapitalist feminism to attack the entrenched
hegemony of class divisions. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic narrative that
includes consciousness as a paradox.
"Class is fundamentally meaningless," says Derrida. It could be said that the
premise of subcapitalist feminism suggests that the goal of the participant is significant
form. Ashwander[17] states that we have to choose between subtextual
theory and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. However, Habermas uses the term
'subtextual theory' to denote the role of the reader as artist.
If one examines Sontagian camp, one is faced with a choice: either accept subtextual
theory or conclude that culture serves to reinforce capitalism. Several desituationisms
concerning the dialectic paradigm of discourse exist. In a sense, if subcapitalist
feminism holds, the works of Rushdie are empowering. Therefore, Sartre promotes the use of
subtextual theory to attack the hegemony of hierarchy over sexual identity.
"Sexuality is dead," says Lacan. The primary theme of the works of Rushdie is
the praxis, and eventually the futility, of structuralist society. Pickett[18]
holds that we have to choose between subtextual theory and the dialectic paradigm of
discourse.
However, the premise of posttextual capitalism states that narrativity is capable of
significance, given that Foucault's analysis of subcapitalist feminism is valid.
Marx uses the term 'semantic neocapitalist theory' to denote the bridge between sexual
identity and class. The subject is contextualised into a subcapitalist feminism that
includes culture as a totality. But Mensonge promotes the use of subtextual theory to
transgress the boundaries of sexual identity. The creation/destruction distinction
depicted in Reservoir Dogs is also evident in Clerks, although in a more self-referential
sense.
Baudrillard uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of discourse' to denote a
mythopoetical whole.
Therefore, any number of discourses concerning subtextual theory may be found. The
cultural paradigm of context implies that reality must come from the masses. Thus, Abian[19] suggests that we have to choose between subcapitalist feminism and
the dialectic paradigm of discourse.
The subject is interpolated into a precapitalist deconstructivist theory that includes
consciousness as a reality. It could be said that the characteristic theme of Cameron's[20] critique of subtextual theory is not deconstructivism, as the
dialectic paradigm of discourse suggests, but subdeconstructivism. Bataille suggests the
use of subcapitalist feminism to challenge the entrenched hegemony of capitalist ideology.
In a sense, Debord's model of postcultural narrative holds that the raison d'etre of the
artist is significant form.
7. The dialectic paradigm of discourse and conceptual modernist theory
"Language is elitist," says Saussure; however, according to Finnis[21] , it is not so much language that is elitist, but rather the rubicon
of language. A number of deconstructions concerning the bridge between society and sexual
identity may be revealed. Mellen[22] implies that we have to choose
between conceptual modernist theory and subtextual theory.
The main theme of the works of Tarantino is the meaninglessness, and thus the defining
characteristic, of textual class. But Adorno uses the term 'subsemantic theory' to denote
the role of the observer as participant. In From Dusk Till Dawn, Tarantino reiterates the
dialectic paradigm of discourse; in Reservoir Dogs, however, Tarantino examines Derridean
reading. Therefore, if conceptual modernist theory holds, we have to choose between
conceptual modernist theory and subtextual theory.
The subject is interpolated into a subtextual theory that includes reality as a
paradox.
Sartre uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of discourse' to denote a self-fulfilling
whole.
However, the main theme of Humphrey's[23] essay on cultural
materialist theory is not sublimation per se, but presublimation. Conceptual modernist
theory states that the media is capable of intent. In a sense, Sontag promotes the use of
Habermasian discourse to deconstruct archaic perceptions of art.
8. Discourses of genre
In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between ground and
figure. The subject is contextualised into a dialectic paradigm of discourse that includes
truth as a whole.
Thus, Marx uses the term 'subtextual theory' to denote the role of the writer as poet.
An abundance of narratives concerning conceptual modernist theory exist.
The absurdity, and some would say the failure, of capitalist discourse which is a
central theme of Pulp Fiction emerges again in Natural Born Killers. It could be said that
Hubbard[24] suggests that we have to choose between subtextual theory
and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. The subject is interpolated into a conceptual
modernist theory that includes sexuality as a totality. The premise of subtextual theory
states that culture is used in the service of the hegemony of sexism over narrativity, but
only if textual theory is invalid; if that is not the case, we can assume that
consciousness serves to marginalize minorities. Debord uses the term 'the dialectic
paradigm of discourse' to denote the dialectic, and subsequent paradigm, of
postsemioticist society. Therefore, Lacan promotes the use of conceptual modernist theory
to challenge the entrenched hegemony of the status quo.
9. Tarantino and subtextual theory
If one examines the dialectic paradigm of discourse, one is faced with a choice: either
accept the cultural paradigm of expression or conclude that art has objective value. Many
narratives concerning the difference between sexual identity and class exist. The primary
theme of the works of Tarantino is a neoconstructive reality. If dialectic subdialectic
theory holds, the works of Tarantino are reminiscent of Spelling.
In the works of Tarantino, a predominant concept is the distinction between within and
without. In a sense, von Junz[25] holds that we have to choose between
the dialectic paradigm of discourse and conceptual modernist theory. The subject is
contextualised into a subtextual theory that includes language as a paradox.
"Sexual identity is problematic," says Foucault; however, according to
Geoffrey[26] , it is not so much sexual identity that is problematic,
but rather the economy, and eventually the nothingness, of sexual identity. Therefore,
Saussure uses the term 'capitalist capitalism' to denote not, in fact, theory, but
neotheory. The main theme of la Tournier's[27] critique of conceptual
modernist theory is the fatal flaw of prestructural reality.
Several materialisms concerning the dialectic paradigm of discourse may be discovered.
The subject is interpolated into a subtextual theory that includes truth as a totality.
But Werther[28] states that we have to choose between the
subdialectic paradigm of reality and conceptual modernist theory. Adorno's analysis of
subtextual theory suggests that the State is intrinsically unattainable. However, in
Ulysses, Joyce affirms cultural deconstruction; in Ulysses, Joyce denies the dialectic
paradigm of discourse.
Lyotard suggests the use of subtextual theory to modify society. Bataille uses the term
'conceptual modernist theory' to denote not narrative, as Baudrillard would have it, but
postnarrative.
It could be said that the characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is the role of the
writer as reader. The premise of premodernist postdeconstructive theory implies that the
purpose of the artist is social comment, but only if sexuality is interchangeable with
art. Any number of situationisms concerning conceptual modernist theory exist.
10. The dialectic paradigm of discourse and subtextual Marxism
"Narrativity is part of the stasis of consciousness," says Habermas. Thus,
the subject is contextualised into a subtextual theory that includes sexuality as a
reality. Du Garbandier[29] implies that we have to choose between
Adornian aesthetics and subtextual theory.
The main theme of Wilson's[30] critique of the dialectic paradigm
of discourse is the bridge between culture and sexual identity. But Derrida promotes the
use of subtextual Marxism to attack hierarchy.
The example of the submaterialist paradigm of context intrinsic to Dubliners emerges
again in Ulysses. However, Marx uses the term 'subtextual theory' to denote the collapse,
and some would say the absurdity, of dialectic class.
The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is the role of the writer as observer.
Lacan's model of the dialectic paradigm of discourse holds that the establishment is
capable of deconstruction.
In a sense, a number of theories concerning a mythopoetical whole exist. The subject is
interpolated into a presemiotic discourse that includes reality as a paradox.
11. Joyce and capitalist libertarianism
If one examines subtextual Marxism, one is faced with a choice: either reject the
dialectic paradigm of discourse or conclude that consensus comes from communication.
Therefore, if subtextual theory holds, we have to choose between subtextual Marxism and
subtextual theory. Sontag uses the term 'the dialectic paradigm of discourse' to denote
not narrative, but postnarrative.
"Society is responsible for capitalism," says Lyotard; however, according to
Ardois-Bonnot[31] , it is not so much society that is responsible for
capitalism, but rather the praxis, and hence the paradigm, of society. In a sense, in
Finnegan's Wake, Joyce reiterates Debordian image; in Ulysses, however, Joyce reiterates
subtextual Marxism. Mensonge suggests the use of subtextual theory to deconstruct class
divisions. Several deappropriations concerning the dialectic paradigm of discourse exist.
In a sense, Bataille uses the term 'cultural theory' to denote not, in fact, discourse,
but subdiscourse. Subtextual theory holds that language may be used to reinforce
colonialist perceptions of sexual identity. It could be said that Foucault promotes the
use of textual theory to read and challenge class. Thus, the subject is interpolated into
a dialectic paradigm of discourse that includes truth as a whole. An abundance of
situationisms concerning a self-justifying totality may be found.
However, if subtextual Marxism holds, we have to choose between the predialectic
paradigm of narrative and subtextual theory. The primary theme of Drucker's[32]
essay on the dialectic paradigm of discourse is the difference between reality and
society. But the rubicon, and subsequent meaninglessness, of subtextual Marxism prevalent
in Finnegan's Wake is also evident in Finnegan's Wake. Tilton[33]
states that the works of Joyce are not postmodern. In a sense, Baudrillard uses the term
'neoconstructivist semiotic theory' to denote the failure of postcultural society.
Structuralist nihilism suggests that society has intrinsic meaning.
12. Subtextual theory and Saussurean semiotics
"Class is part of the paradigm of art," says Sontag. Therefore, if the
dialectic paradigm of discourse holds, we have to choose between Saussurean semiotics and
the dialectic paradigm of discourse.
Therefore, Derrida promotes the use of dialectic narrative to analyse and deconstruct
sexual identity. In La Dolce Vita, Fellini affirms subtextual theory; in The City of
Women, Fellini analyses the textual paradigm of context.
However, many dematerialisms concerning Saussurean semiotics exist. The subject is
interpolated into a dialectic paradigm of discourse that includes consciousness as a
reality. Habermas's analysis of capitalist subpatriarchial theory holds that the raison
d'etre of the participant is deconstruction. It could be said that Faustroll[34] implies that we have to choose between subtextual theory and
Saussurean semiotics.
1. Hanfkopf, N. ed. (1975) Reassessing Expressionism: The dialectic
paradigm of discourse in the works of Gibson. Harvard University Press
2. Drucker, C. E. K. ed. (1988) The Absurdity of Discourse: The
dialectic paradigm of discourse and subtextual theory. Panic Button Books
3. Wilson, S. (1970) Subtextual theory in the works of Burroughs.
University of Illinois Press
4. Tilton, W. Z. ed. (1983) The dialectic paradigm of discourse and
subtextual theory. O'Reilly & Associates
5. Ardois-Bonnot, P. G. (1979) Dialectic Discourses: Subtextual theory
and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. Loompanics
6. von Ludwig, M. T. U. ed. (1977) The dialectic paradigm of
discourse, nihilism and structural deconceptualism. And/Or Press
7. McElwaine, V. (1971) The dialectic paradigm of discourse and
subtextual theory. University of Massachusetts Press
8. Brophy, J. L. B. ed. (1982) Dialectics of Meaninglessness:
Subtextual theory and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. Oxford University Press
9. Bassett, I. D. (1988) The dialectic paradigm of discourse in the
works of Wood. University of Massachusetts Press
10. d'Erlette, F. N. Q. ed. (1976) Realities of Stasis: Subtextual
theory and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. Panic Button Books
11. Sargeant, O. H. (1984) The Consensus of Genre: The dialectic
paradigm of discourse in the works of Spelling. Cambridge University Press
12. Prinn, Y. A. C. ed. (1975) Subtextual theory in the works of
Madonna. Schlangekraft
13. Parry, R. (1987) The Paradigm of Class: The dialectic paradigm of
discourse and subtextual theory. Yale University Press
14. Hatchjaw, W. S. (1979) The dialectic paradigm of discourse,
nihilism and cultural discourse. O'Reilly & Associates
15. Scuglia, K. E. Z. ed. (1980) Reinventing Surrealism: Subtextual
theory and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. And/Or Press
16. Buxton, P. (1976) Forgetting Derrida: The dialectic paradigm of
discourse in the works of Glass. Harvard University Press
17. Ashwander, T. M. (1982) The dialectic paradigm of discourse in
the works of Rushdie. University of California Press
18. Pickett, U. (1981) Subtextual theory in the works of Tarantino.
Loompanics
19. Abian, G. J. V. ed. (1973) Textual nationalism, the dialectic
paradigm of discourse and nihilism. University of Massachusetts Press
20. Cameron, I. (1987) The Fatal flaw of Narrative: The dialectic
paradigm of discourse and subtextual theory. O'Reilly & Associates
21. Finnis, L. ed. (1978) The dialectic paradigm of discourse and
subtextual theory. Panic Button Books
22. Mellen, B. D. F. (1975) The dialectic paradigm of discourse in
the works of Koons. Schlangekraft
23. Humphrey, Q. H. ed. (1984) Subtextual theory and the dialectic
paradigm of discourse. And/Or Press
24. Hubbard, C. ed. (1979) The Forgotten Sky: The dialectic paradigm
of discourse, postpatriarchial rationalism and nihilism. Cambridge University Press
25. von Junz, N. A. O. (1972) Conceptualist Deappropriations: The
dialectic paradigm of discourse and subtextual theory. University of California Press
26. Geoffrey, Y. R. ed. (1980) Subtextual theory in the works of
Otomo. O'Reilly & Associates
27. la Tournier, S. ed. (1976) The dialectic paradigm of discourse in
the works of Joyce. Oxford University Press
28. Werther, W. E. (1987) The Iron Sea: Subtextual theory and the
dialectic paradigm of discourse. And/Or Press
29. du Garbandier, T. P. K. (1971) Subtextual theory and the
dialectic paradigm of discourse. University of North Carolina Press
30. Wilson, Z. (1984) The dialectic paradigm of discourse and
subtextual theory. Panic Button Books
31. Ardois-Bonnot, M. L. ed. (1973) Deconstructing Sartre: Nihilism,
neopatriarchial semanticism and the dialectic paradigm of discourse. Schlangekraft
32. Drucker, C. (1978) Realities of Futility: The dialectic paradigm
of discourse in the works of Lynch. Loompanics
33. Tilton, U. V. ed. (1985) The Expression of Defining
characteristic: Subtextual theory in the works of Fellini. University of Georgia Press
34. Faustroll, G. D. B. (1986) Subtextual theory and the dialectic
paradigm of discourse. O'Reilly & Associates
About DADA-ENGINE program |
POSTMODERNISTOU
SNADNO A RYCHLE